ietf-smtp  

Messages by Date

• 2008/08/08 Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question) Hector Santos
• 2008/08/08 Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures Hector Santos
• 2008/08/08 Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question) SM
• 2008/08/08 Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question) SM
• 2008/08/08 Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question) Hector Santos
• 2008/08/08 Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures Hector Santos
• 2008/08/08 Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question) SM
• 2008/08/08 Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question) ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/08/08 Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures Hector Santos
• 2008/08/08 Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question) Hector Santos
• 2008/08/08 Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures Tony Finch
• 2008/08/08 Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures Frank Ellermann
• 2008/08/08 Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question) Tony Finch
• 2008/08/08 Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question) John R Levine
• 2008/08/08 Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question) Tony Finch
• 2008/08/08 Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures Tony Finch
• 2008/08/08 Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures Paul Smith
• 2008/08/08 Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question) Paul Smith
• 2008/08/08 Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question) ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/08/08 Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question) ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/08/08 Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question) John R Levine
• 2008/08/08 Re: Forwarding in the face of spam Keith Moore
• 2008/08/08 Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question) Richard Kay
• 2008/08/08 Forwarding in the face of spam Alessandro Vesely
• 2008/08/07 Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question) John Levine
• 2008/08/07 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question) John C Klensin
• 2008/08/07 Re: retry question Tony Finch
• 2008/08/07 Re: retry question Hector Santos
• 2008/08/06 Re: retry question Hector Santos
• 2008/08/06 Re: retry question SM
• 2008/08/06 Re: retry question Tony Finch
• 2008/08/06 Re: retry question ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/08/06 Re: retry question Tony Finch
• 2008/08/06 Re: retry question Hector Santos
• 2008/08/06 Re: retry question SM
• 2008/08/05 Re: retry question Hector Santos
• 2008/08/05 Re: retry question ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/08/05 Re: retry question Hector Santos
• 2008/08/05 Re: retry question Hector Santos
• 2008/08/05 Re: retry question Hector Santos
• 2008/08/05 Re: retry question Hector Santos
• 2008/08/05 Re: retry question ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/08/05 Re: retry question Tony Finch
• 2008/08/05 Re: retry question SM
• 2008/08/05 retry question Tony Finch
• 2008/07/22 Re: Approved (was: Unsticking rfc2821bis) John C Klensin
• 2008/07/22 FWD: ID Tracker State Update Notice: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis John C Klensin
• 2008/07/22 Approved (was: Unsticking rfc2821bis) Frank Ellermann
• 2008/07/20 Re: Unsticking rfc2821bis Frank Ellermann
• 2008/07/19 Re: Unsticking rfc2821bis SM
• 2008/07/19 Re: Unsticking rfc2821bis ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/07/19 Re: Unsticking rfc2821bis Frank Ellermann
• 2008/07/19 Re: Unsticking rfc2821bis ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/07/19 Re: Unsticking rfc2821bis SM
• 2008/07/19 Re: Unsticking rfc2821bis Dave Crocker
• 2008/07/19 Re: Unsticking rfc2821bis Lisa Dusseault
• 2008/07/18 Re: Unsticking rfc2821bis SM
• 2008/07/18 Re: Unsticking rfc2821bis Dave Crocker
• 2008/07/18 Re: Unsticking rfc2821bis Lisa Dusseault
• 2008/07/18 Re: Unsticking rfc2821bis Frank Ellermann
• 2008/07/18 Re: Unsticking rfc2821bis Dave Crocker
• 2008/07/18 Re: Unsticking rfc2821bis John C Klensin
• 2008/07/18 Re: Unsticking rfc2821bis SM
• 2008/07/18 Who standardizes the standardization process? (was: Re: Unsticking rfc2821bis) Alessandro Vesely
• 2008/07/17 Re: Unsticking rfc2821bis Frank Ellermann
• 2008/07/17 Re: Unsticking rfc2821bis Dave Crocker
• 2008/07/17 Re: Unsticking rfc2821bis Tony Hansen
• 2008/07/17 Unsticking rfc2821bis John C Klensin
• 2008/07/11 Re: rfc2821bis-11 posted -- contents and status report John C Klensin
• 2008/07/11 Re: rfc2821bis-11 posted -- contents and status report SM
• 2008/07/11 Re: rfc2821bis-11 posted -- contents and status report John C Klensin
• 2008/07/11 Re: rfc2821bis-11 posted -- contents and status report Tony Hansen
• 2008/07/11 rfc2821bis-11 posted -- contents and status report John C Klensin
• 2008/07/10 Re: More new text for 2821bis SM
• 2008/07/10 Re: Auto-Submitted and Autosubmitted Frank Ellermann
• 2008/07/09 Re: More new text for 2821bis (was: Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008) ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/07/09 Re: More new text for 2821bis (was: Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008) Chris Newman
• 2008/07/09 Re: Auto-Submitted and Autosubmitted Pete Resnick
• 2008/07/09 Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008 Chris Newman
• 2008/07/09 Re: Auto-Submitted and Autosubmitted ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/07/09 Auto-Submitted and Autosubmitted Дилян Палаузов
• 2008/07/09 Re: I-D Action:draft-hathcock-minger-05.txt Frank Ellermann
• 2008/07/09 Re: More new text for 2821bis (was: Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008) John C Klensin
• 2008/07/09 Re: More new text for 2821bis (was: Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008) SM
• 2008/07/09 Re: More new text for 2821bis John C Klensin
• 2008/07/09 Re: More new text for 2821bis (was: Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008) John C Klensin
• 2008/07/09 Re: More new text for 2821bis Frank Ellermann
• 2008/07/09 Re: More new text for 2821bis (was: Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008) John C Klensin
• 2008/07/09 Re: More new text for 2821bis (was: Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008) John Leslie
• 2008/07/09 Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008 Tony Finch
• 2008/07/09 Re: More new text for 2821bis (was: Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008) SM
• 2008/07/09 Re: More new text for 2821bis (was: Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008) Pete Resnick
• 2008/07/09 Re: More new text for 2821bis Keith Moore
• 2008/07/09 Re: More new text for 2821bis John C Klensin
• 2008/07/09 Re: More new text for 2821bis Keith Moore
• 2008/07/09 Re: More new text for 2821bis Frank Ellermann
• 2008/07/09 More new text for 2821bis (was: Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008) John C Klensin
• 2008/07/08 Re: IESG response fixes for 2821bis SM
• 2008/07/08 Re: IESG response fixes for 2821bis Tony Hansen
• 2008/07/08 Re: borderline offtopic about examples Frank Ellermann
• 2008/07/08 Re: borderline offtopic about examples SM
• 2008/07/08 Re: borderline offtopic about examples Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2008/07/08 Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008 Cyrus Daboo
• 2008/07/08 Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008 Francesco Gennai
• 2008/07/08 Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008 Francesco Gennai
• 2008/07/08 Re: IESG response fixes for 2821bis Tony Hansen
• 2008/07/08 Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008 John Leslie
• 2008/07/08 Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008 Alexey Melnikov
• 2008/07/08 Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008 Keith Moore
• 2008/07/08 Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008 Alessandro Vesely
• 2008/07/08 Re: borderline offtopic about examples Frank Ellermann
• 2008/07/08 Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008 Steve Atkins
• 2008/07/08 Re: IESG response fixes for 2821bis Frank Ellermann
• 2008/07/08 Re: borderline offtopic about examples John C Klensin
• 2008/07/08 Re: IESG response fixes for 2821bis John C Klensin
• 2008/07/08 borderline offtopic about examples Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2008/07/08 Re: IESG response fixes for 2821bis Magnus Westerlund
• 2008/07/08 Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008 Hector Santos
• 2008/07/08 Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008 Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2008/07/07 Re: IESG response fixes for 2821bis Frank Ellermann
• 2008/07/07 Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008 SM
• 2008/07/07 IESG response fixes for 2821bis Tony Hansen
• 2008/07/07 Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008 Keld Jørn Simonsen
• 2008/07/07 Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008 Dave Crocker
• 2008/07/07 Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008 ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/07/07 Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008 Jim Fenton
• 2008/07/07 Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008 Tony Hansen
• 2008/07/07 Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-2008 IESG Secretary
• 2008/07/04 Re: Standardized tag (was: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10: ABNF discuss) SM
• 2008/07/03 Re: Standardized tag (was: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10: ABNF discuss) John C Klensin
• 2008/07/03 Re: Standardized tag (was: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10: ABNF discuss) John Leslie
• 2008/07/03 Re: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10: ABNF discuss John C Klensin
• 2008/07/03 Re: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10: ABNF discuss Magnus Westerlund
• 2008/07/01 Standardized tag (was: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10: ABNF discuss) SM
• 2008/07/01 Re: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10: ABNF discuss John C Klensin
• 2008/07/01 draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10: ABNF discuss Magnus Westerlund
• 2008/06/30 Re: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10: ABNF discuss Frank Ellermann
• 2008/06/30 draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10: ABNF discuss Magnus Westerlund
• 2008/06/30 An interesting proposal for SMTP 'Stephane Bortzmeyer'
• 2008/06/23 Re: name and filename parameters Francesco Gennai
• 2008/06/22 Re: name and filename parameters ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/06/21 Re: name and filename parameters Keith Moore
• 2008/06/21 name and filename parameters Francesco Gennai
• 2008/06/12 Re: Handling of Missing Required Fields Hector Santos
• 2008/06/12 Re: Handling of Missing Required Fields Pete Resnick
• 2008/06/12 Re: Handling of Missing Required Fields Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2008/06/10 Re: Handling of Missing Required Fields Pete Resnick
• 2008/06/10 Re: Handling of Missing Required Fields SM
• 2008/06/09 Handling of Missing Required Fields Hector Santos
• 2008/06/09 Re: IESG approval status of rfc2821bis Lisa Dusseault
• 2008/06/09 Re: IESG approval status of rfc2821bis Keith Moore
• 2008/06/09 Re: IESG approval status of rfc2821bis John C Klensin
• 2008/06/09 Re: IESG approval status of rfc2821bis Lisa Dusseault
• 2008/06/06 Re: IESG approval status of rfc2821bis Pete Resnick
• 2008/06/06 Re: IESG approval status of rfc2821bis Keith Moore
• 2008/06/06 Re: IESG approval status of rfc2821bis Pete Resnick
• 2008/06/06 Re: IESG approval status of rfc2821bis John C Klensin
• 2008/06/06 Re: IESG approval status of rfc2821bis John Leslie
• 2008/06/05 New 2606bis draft (was: IESG approval status of rfc2821bis) Frank Ellermann
• 2008/06/05 Re: IESG approval status of rfc2821bis SM
• 2008/06/05 Re: IESG approval status of rfc2821bis Frank Ellermann
• 2008/06/05 Re: IESG approval status of rfc2821bis Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2008/06/05 Re: IESG approval status of rfc2821bis Keith Moore
• 2008/06/05 Re: IESG approval status of rfc2821bis Keith Moore
• 2008/06/05 Re: IESG approval status of rfc2821bis Dave Crocker
• 2008/06/05 IESG approval status of rfc2821bis John C Klensin
• 2008/05/28 Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/05/27 Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/05/27 Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout Tony Finch
• 2008/05/27 Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout Paul Smith
• 2008/05/27 Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout Tony Finch
• 2008/05/27 Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout Paul Smith
• 2008/05/27 Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout Bill McQuillan
• 2008/05/26 Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout Robert A. Rosenberg
• 2008/05/26 Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout Robert A. Rosenberg
• 2008/05/26 Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout Hector Santos
• 2008/05/26 Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout John Levine
• 2008/05/26 Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout John Levine
• 2008/05/26 Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2008/05/26 Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/05/26 Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout Tony Finch
• 2008/05/26 Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout Arnt Gulbrandsen
• 2008/05/25 Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout Tony Finch
• 2008/05/25 Re: private key BATV is useful mouss
• 2008/05/25 Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/05/25 Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/05/25 Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout Hector Santos
• 2008/05/25 Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout John C Klensin
• 2008/05/25 Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout John Levine
• 2008/05/24 Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout SM
• 2008/05/24 Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/05/23 Re: Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout John C Klensin
• 2008/05/23 Proposal for Adjusted DATA Timeout Hector Santos
• 2008/05/22 Re: Existing email address meta-syntax standards, especially GSTN Douglas Otis
• 2008/05/22 Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis? ned+ietf-smtp
• 2008/05/22 Re: Existing email address meta-syntax standards, especially GSTN John Levine
• 2008/05/22 Re: BATV pseudo-Last Call Peter J. Holzer
• 2008/05/22 Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis? Tony Hansen
• 2008/05/22 Re: Mailing Lists v. BATV Peter J. Holzer
• 2008/05/22 Re: BATV breaks rfc2821bis? Robert A. Rosenberg

• Earlier messages
• Later messages