> Tony Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Now that the appeal is done and out of the way, do people prefer > > > > 1) none of the domain names be changed? > > 2) all domain names be changed, except Jon Postel's isi.edu and usc.edu > > references > > 3) all domain names be changed > > > > I would like to get a quick consensus call for this question. Please > > respond by Thursday, July 10.
> Since you ask, I'd recommend #2 (assuming isi.edu is OK with it). > Understand, it's inevitable that future documents will copy text > from 2821bis, and either have to face this issue when it's no longer > fresh in people's mind, or ask for an exception to the RECOMMENDED. > There can be no _fully_ satisfactory resolution to that. You could insert a paragraph (appendix?) to explains the exception.... so that also for documents that will copy text from 2821bis or for future revision that will remain a valid exception and .... it could help to maintain this issue fresh in people's mind. Francesco > I do not mean to lobby for changing _all_ examples, least of all > mechanically changing _all_ examples -- changing the ones we're > confident we can get right is certainly sufficient. > We should, at a minimim, consider changing the examples which > reference domains which _are_ registered to folks today. > -- > John Leslie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
