--On Wednesday, 09 July, 2008 12:20 -0700 SM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At 10:54 09-07-2008, John C Klensin wrote: >> But 3932 applies exclusively to independent submissions. It >> has nothing at all to do with Standards Track documents. > > Yes. That's the only document I could find that covers IESG > notes. Unless I missed it, there isn't anything in 2026 or > 3710 about such notes for Standard Track documents. Is this > practice documented anywhere? Not that I'm aware of. john
- Re: More new text for 2821bis John C Klensin
- Re: More new text for 2821bis Keith Moore
- Re: More new text for 2821bis Frank Ellermann
- Re: More new text for 2821bis John C Klensin
- Re: More new text for 2821bis (was: Re: Res... Pete Resnick
- Re: More new text for 2821bis (was: Re:... John Leslie
- Re: More new text for 2821bis (was... John C Klensin
- Re: More new text for 2821bis (was: Re: Res... SM
- Re: More new text for 2821bis (was: Re:... John C Klensin
- Re: More new text for 2821bis (was... SM
- Re: More new text for 2821bis (was... John C Klensin
- Re: More new text for 2821bis (was: Re: Res... Chris Newman
- Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-20... Hector Santos
- Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-20... Alessandro Vesely
- Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-20... Keith Moore
- Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-20... John Leslie
- Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-J... Francesco Gennai
- Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated ... Francesco Gennai
- Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-20... Cyrus Daboo
- Re: Response to appeal from John Klensin dated 13-Jun-20... Chris Newman
