At 18:12 -0500 11/30/99, Mark Atwood wrote: >John Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> Correct. Lets get an application name space so we don't need to worry >> about it. >> > >Please gods below, not more ASN.1 What a strange reaction!? What does an arcane syntax notation have to do with Shoch's observation that there are 3 kinds of addresses: applications, hosts, and routes? What have you been smoking? > >-- >Mark Atwood | >[EMAIL PROTECTED] | >http://www.pobox.com/~mra |
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocation... Perry E. Metzger
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Steve Hultquist
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Melinda . Shore
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocation... Henning Schulzrinne
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Steve Hultquist
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Pyda Srisuresh
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocation... Keith Moore
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Tony Dal Santo
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocation... John Day
- Re: IP network address assignments/alloca... Mark Atwood
- Application name space and ASN.1 (Re:... John Day
- Application name space and ASN.1 ... Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Application name space a... John Day
- Re: IP network address assignments/alloca... Thomas Narten
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Pyda Srisuresh
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Pyda Srisuresh
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Bob Braden
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Melinda . Shore
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Ian King
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Tony Hain (Exchange)
