> > the idea is that IPv6 site renumbering will be so much easier than for
> > IPv4 that renumbering will be *less* painful than NATting.
>
> this needs to be reconciled with the *much* more conservative statements on
> v6 renumber-ability coming from respected v6 folk such as deering et alia.
Whoa, Randy, time out. Can you cite such a statement which conflicts
with what Brian wrote above?
Matt
- Re: IP network address assign... Tripp Lilley
- Re: IP network address assign... Keith Moore
- Re: IP network address assign... John Stracke
- Re: IP network address assign... Matt Holdrege
- Re: IP network address assign... Keith Moore
- Re: IP network address assign... Bill Manning
- Re: IP network address assign... Tripp Lilley
- Re: IP network address assign... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IP network address assign... Keith Moore
- Re: IP network address assignment... Randy Bush
- Re: IP network address assign... Matt Crawford
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations informat... Bob Braden
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Brian E Carpenter
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocations informat... Michael Welzl
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations informat... Bob Braden
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations informat... Tony Dal Santo
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations informat... J. Noel Chiappa
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations inf... Jon Crowcroft
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocations informat... Ian King
