The point is that even conservative policies could easily allow a /64 per household. Brian Sean Doran wrote: > > | 1. if IPv6 allocation policies aren't a fair amount more liberal > | than IPv4 ones in how much address space is doled out, they're > | broken. there's still a need to aggregate addresses for routing > | purposes, but there's no need to be stingy about doling them out. > > We are agreed that there is absolutely a need to aggregate > addresses for routing purposes, whether we are talking IPv4 > or IPv6. > > So, how many /20s are there in IPv6? > > Sean.
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations info... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations informati... Sean Doran
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations info... Bill Manning
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations ... Sean Doran
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocati... Perry E. Metzger
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocati... Bill Manning
- Re: IP network address assignments/allo... Francis Dupont
- Re: IP network address assignments/allo... Bill Sommerfeld
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocati... Christian Huitema
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations info... Robert Elz
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocations info... Brian E Carpenter
- RE: IP network address assignments/allocations informati... Ian King
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations info... Perry E. Metzger
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations informati... J. Noel Chiappa
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations informati... Pyda Srisuresh
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations informati... J. Noel Chiappa
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations informati... Ed Gerck
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations informati... Sean Doran
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations info... Brian E Carpenter
