> >No, it would be an old protocol. See RFC1440, from July 1993. > >Is there sufficient interest to create a working group to overhaul RFC1440 >into something more usable in today's Internet? People using SMTP for large file transfer has been a pet peeve of mine for several years, having been tasked with administering email for a large federal agency (I don't do that anymore, thankfully, but I sympathize with admins who do), so I for one would be quite interested in participating in such an effort RGF Robert G. Ferrell Internet Technologist National Business Center, US DoI [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Email messages: How large is too larg... Reto Lichtensteiger
- Re: Email messages: How large is too ... Jon Crowcroft
- Re: Email messages: How large is too ... Dick St.Peters
- FW: Email messages: How large is too large? Robin Uyeshiro
- Re: Email messages: How large is too large? Vernon Schryver
- RE: Email messages: How large is too large? Linscheid, Sven
- Re: Email messages: How large is too large? Martin Djernaes
- RE: Email messages: How large is too large? Vernon Schryver
- RE: Email messages: How large is too large? Mason, Shane
- Re: Email messages: How large is too large? Vernon Schryver
- RE: Email messages: How large is too large? Robert G. Ferrell
- RE: Email messages: How large is too large? Mason, Shane
- RE: Email messages: How large is too large? Mason, Shane
- RE: Email messages: How large is too large? Richard Shockey
- Re: Email messages: How large is too large? John Stracke
- RE: Email messages: How large is too large? Vernon Schryver
- Re: Email messages: How large is too large? Vernon Schryver
- Re: Email messages: How large is too large? Perry E. Metzger
- Re: Email messages: How large is too large? John Stracke
- Re: Email messages: How large is too large? Scott Bradner
- Re: Email messages: How large is too large? Dave Crocker