"Mason, Shane" wrote: > But I can do that already, by sending an email with a huge attachment direct > to your SMTP server that has a destination with a name and IP, but no > physical site. It will stay at your site until your SMTP timeout kicks in. That's one reason almost nobody runs open relays. -- /================================================================\ |John Stracke | http://www.ecal.com |My opinions are my own. | |Chief Scientist |===============================================| |eCal Corp. |A ship is safe in a harbor, but that's not what| |[EMAIL PROTECTED]|a ship is for. | \================================================================/
- Re: Email messages: How large is too large? Vernon Schryver
- RE: Email messages: How large is too large? Linscheid, Sven
- Re: Email messages: How large is too large? Martin Djernaes
- RE: Email messages: How large is too large? Vernon Schryver
- RE: Email messages: How large is too large? Mason, Shane
- Re: Email messages: How large is too large? Vernon Schryver
- Re: Email messages: How large is too large? Robert G. Ferrell
- RE: Email messages: How large is too large? Mason, Shane
- RE: Email messages: How large is too large? Mason, Shane
- RE: Email messages: How large is too large? Richard Shockey
- RE: Email messages: How large is too large? John Stracke
- RE: Email messages: How large is too large? Vernon Schryver
- Re: Email messages: How large is too large? Vernon Schryver
- Re: Email messages: How large is too large? Perry E. Metzger
- Re: Email messages: How large is too large? John Stracke
- Re: Email messages: How large is too large? Scott Bradner
- Re: Email messages: How large is too large? Dave Crocker
- Re: Email messages: How large is too large? Peter Deutsch