--On 2000-01-05 01.29 -0800, Ed Gerck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alternatively, you may verify your mailbox of RAB messages and > decide by yourself. Also, NSI may verify the discrepancies by > themselves. As the I-D didn't exist when the RAB existed (the date of the I-D is December of 1999), it is plain impossible to have discussed where the I-D differs from what was in use. Please try again. paf
- Re: Last Call: Registry Registrar Protocol (RRP) Ve... Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: Last Call: Registry Registrar Protocol (RRP) Ve... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Last Call: Registry Registrar Protocol (RRP) Ve... Gordon Cook
- Re: Last Call: Registry Registrar Protocol (RRP) Ve... Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
- Re: Last Call: Registry Registrar Protocol (RRP) Ve... David R. Conrad
- Re: Last Call: Registry Registrar Protocol (RRP) Ve... Ed Gerck
- Re: Last Call: Registry Registrar Protocol (RRP) Ve... David R. Conrad
- Back to the drawing board, was Re: Last Call: Regis... Ed Gerck
- Re: Back to the drawing board, was Re: Last Call: R... Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: Back to the drawing board, was Re: Last Call: R... Ed Gerck
- Re: Back to the drawing board, was Re: Last Call: R... Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: Back to the drawing board, was Re: Last Call: R... Ed Gerck
- Re: Back to the drawing board, was Re: Last Call: R... Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: Back to the drawing board, was Re: Last Call: R... Ed Gerck
- Re: Back to the drawing board, was Re: Last Call: R... Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: Back to the drawing board, was Re: Last Call: R... Randy Bush
- Re: Back to the drawing board, was Re: Last Call: R... Rick H Wesson
- Re: Back to the drawing board, was Re: Last Call: R... Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: Last Call: Registry Registrar Protocol (RRP) Ve... Dave Crocker
- Re: Last Call: Registry Registrar Protocol (RRP) Ve... Rick H Wesson
- Re: Last Call: Registry Registrar Protocol (RRP) Ve... John W. Noerenberg
