--On 2000-01-05 02.54 -0800, Ed Gerck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How can you say " in some cases (timestamps for example) it is already
> clear that they use what is specified in the I-D"? Did you test it? Have
> you been using the protocol that is in use today?
Because I have already received some comments on the last-call from some
parties which definitely _are_ using the RRP today, and it is confirmed
with NSI.
All comments are not sent in public, you know, but most do answer the
question I, as AD, asks according to the process in the IETF.
Patrik F�ltstr�m
Area Director, Applications Area, IETF
- Re: Last Call: Registry Regi... David R. Conrad
- Re: Last Call: Registry Regi... Ed Gerck
- Re: Last Call: Registry Regi... David R. Conrad
- Back to the drawing board, w... Ed Gerck
- Re: Back to the drawing boar... Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: Back to the drawing boar... Ed Gerck
- Re: Back to the drawing boar... Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: Back to the drawing boar... Ed Gerck
- Re: Back to the drawing boar... Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: Back to the drawing boar... Ed Gerck
- Re: Back to the drawing boar... Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: Back to the drawing boar... Randy Bush
- Re: Back to the drawing boar... Rick H Wesson
- Re: Back to the drawing boar... Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: Last Call: Registry Regi... Dave Crocker
- Re: Last Call: Registry Regi... Rick H Wesson
- Re: Last Call: Registry Regi... John W. Noerenberg
- Re: Last Call: Registry Registrar Protocol (R... Ian Jackson
- Re: Last Call: Registry Registrar Protocol (RRP) Versi... Ed Gerck
- Re: Last Call: Registry Registrar Protocol (RRP) Versi... Vernon Schryver
