I think various people have made a good case for eventually publishing this particular document, once appropriate revisions have been made. I'm very supportive of the notion of free exchange of ideas, even through the RFC mechanism - with the understanding that: - IETF and the RFC Editor have limited resources and cannot publish everything that comes their way - it's inappropriate to use Experimental or Informational publications in the RFC series to promote or claim legitimacy for ideas that are embroynic or experimental in nature, especially when those ideas are violations of Internet standards. there should be a clear distinction between "this is somebody's idea for an experiment" and "this is the sense of the Internet technical community" - some experiments are better carried out under controlled conditions. Keith
- Re: breaking the IP model (or not) Brian E Carpenter
- Re: breaking the IP model (or not) Scott Brim
- Re: breaking the IP model (or not) Keith Moore
- Re: breaking the IP model (or not) Scott Brim
- Re: recommendation against publication o... Keith Moore
- Re: recommendation against publicati... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: recommendation against publicati... Keith Moore
- Re: recommendation against publicati... Derrell D. Piper
- Re: recommendation against publicati... Keith Moore
- Re: recommendation against publicati... Fred Baker
- Re: recommendation against publicati... Keith Moore
- Re: recommendation against publicati... Joe Touch
- Re: recommendation against publication of draft-cerpa... Dave Crocker
- Re: recommendation against publication of draft-... Keith Moore
- prohibiting RFC publication Dave Crocker
- Re: prohibiting RFC publication Keith Moore
- Re: prohibiting RFC publication Peter Deutsch
- Re: prohibiting RFC publication Keith Moore
- Re: prohibiting RFC publication Martin J.G. Williams
- Re: prohibiting RFC publication Fred Baker
- Re: prohibiting RFC publication Pete Resnick