> > Bottom line is that IP-layer interception - even when done "right" - > > has fairly limited applicability for location of nearby content. > > Though the technique is so widely mis-applied that it might still be > > useful to define what "right" means. > > And there you have the argument for publishing this document. no, this document doesn't try to do that - the protocol it proposes is an attempt to work around one of the many problem associated with interception proxies, but it's hardly a blueprint for how to do them "right" (nor does it purport to be). Keith
- Re: breaking the IP model (or not) Erik Fair
- Re: breaking the IP model (or not) Keith Moore
- Re: breaking the IP model (or not) Brian E Carpenter
- Re: breaking the IP model (or not) Scott Brim
- Re: breaking the IP model (or not) Keith Moore
- Re: breaking the IP model (or not) Scott Brim
- Re: recommendation against publication o... Keith Moore
- Re: recommendation against publicati... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: recommendation against publicati... Keith Moore
- Re: recommendation against publicati... Derrell D. Piper
- Re: recommendation against publicati... Keith Moore
- Re: recommendation against publicati... Fred Baker
- Re: recommendation against publicati... Keith Moore
- Re: recommendation against publicati... Joe Touch
- Re: recommendation against publication of draft-cerpa... Dave Crocker
- Re: recommendation against publication of draft-... Keith Moore
- prohibiting RFC publication Dave Crocker
- Re: prohibiting RFC publication Keith Moore
- Re: prohibiting RFC publication Peter Deutsch
- Re: prohibiting RFC publication Keith Moore
- Re: prohibiting RFC publication Martin J.G. Williams
