> Most users are not > networking geeks. They like NAT because NAT boxes make what they want > to do so easy. presumably they don't realize that the NATs are making it hard to do other things that they might want to do. I wonder...how many of these folks really want network address translation, versus those who just want the other things that NAT boxes often do? (DHCP, firewall, hub, router, all with really easy setup) maybe we need to make it as easy to connect a small net to the Internet, as it is to connect a host. Keith
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Keith Moore
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.tx... Richard Shockey
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-0... Keith Moore
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-0... vinton g. cerf
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complicatio... Richard Shockey
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-compli... John Stracke
- How many IP addresses? Graham Klyne
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-0... Mark Prior
- RE: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-0... Bernard Aboba
- RE: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complicatio... Dick St.Peters
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-compli... Keith Moore
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-co... Randy Bush
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-co... Dick St.Peters
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-co... Peter Johansson
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.tx... Brian Lloyd
- RE: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Ian King
- IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Anthony Atkielski
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Jon Crowcroft
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Anthony Atkielski
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Keith Moore
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? John Stracke