Eric, not that I disagree with anything you said, but I don't see the spam issue as being about commercial use of the Internet - I see it as being about my ability to communicate with correspondents of my choice without interference from others... the fact that I have to pay for such interference doesn't help. Keith
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes B... Mark Atwood
- RE: fyi.. House Committee Pas... James Wilson
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill ... Fred Baker
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes B... Mike Truskowski
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes B... Keith Moore
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Pas... Matt Crawford
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam... Kurt Weber
- RE: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam... Dan Kohn
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam... Eric Brunner
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam... Lillian Komlossy
- RE: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam... Dawson, Peter D
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam... Jeffrey Altman
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam... Bob Allisat
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam... Robert G. Ferrell
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting... Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam... Randall . Gale
- RE: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam... Book, Robert
- RE: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting... Dennis Glatting
