At 09:35 PM 6/15/00 -0400, Keith Moore wrote: >And I hope that the courts will finally realize that freedom of speech >includes the freedom not to have your communications disrupted by people >who want to sell you things. I dunno, Keith. What you are asking for is content control - you are saying that certain content shouldn't get to you. Usually, you are asking that content not be controlled in any way. But I have to say that this particular thread is fairly far afield of anything resembling an engineering topic. Would it be too onerous to ask that it be moved to a free-speech-includes-or-does-not-include-advertising discussion list?
- fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam E-Mail Lillian Komlossy
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam ... Keith Moore
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting S... Doug Isenberg
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiti... Keith Moore
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Li... Chip Rosenthal
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bi... Keith Moore
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bi... Mark Atwood
- RE: fyi.. House Committee Passe... James Wilson
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Li... Fred Baker
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bi... Mike Truskowski
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bi... Keith Moore
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passe... Matt Crawford
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam ... Kurt Weber
- RE: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam ... Dan Kohn
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam ... Eric Brunner
- Re: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam ... Lillian Komlossy
- RE: fyi.. House Committee Passes Bill Limiting Spam ... Dawson, Peter D
