Mohsen BANAN-Public <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> So why has QMTP... not been published as
> an RFC? I understand Dan Bernstein did submit it for publication.
Sir! I am shocked, *shocked*, that you would imply that non-technical
politics would influence the RFC process! (Your winnings, sir. (Thank
you.))
--
Mark Atwood | It is the hardest thing for intellectuals to understand, that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | just because they haven't thought of something, somebody else
| might. <http://www.friesian.com/rifkin.htm>
http://www.pobox.com/~mra
- RE: WAP and IP Ashish Sood
- RE: WAP and IP Vernon Schryver
- RE: WAP and IP Mohsen BANAN-Public
- RE: WAP and IP Patrik F�ltstr�m
- RE: WAP and IP Mohsen BANAN-Public
- RE: WAP and IP Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Now: A Lesser IESG Is A Bett... Mohsen BANAN-Public
- ESRO (RE: WAP and IP) Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: ESRO (RE: WAP and IP) Mohsen BANAN-Public
- Re: ESRO (RE: WAP and IP... Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- RE: WAP and IP Mark Atwood
- RE: WAP and IP Vernon Schryver
- RE: WAP and IP Brijesh Kumar
- RE: WAP and IP Vernon Schryver
- RE: WAP and IP RJ Atkinson
- Re: WAP and IP Marcus Leech
- Re: WAP and IP Randy Bush
- Re: WAP and IP Frank Kastenholz
- RE: WAP and IP Dan Kohn
