->-----Original Message----- ->From: Rakers, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ->Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2000 9:41 AM ->To: 'Dennis Glatting'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ->Subject: RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! -> -> The household will perform NAT for ->all devices ->within (one street address can house many people, not just one). .. and lose out on e2e connectivity ?? imho, primary v6 address arch was to negate the NAT bottleneck..and of course v4 address exhaustion
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! R A Lichtensteiger
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Keith Moore
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Anthony Atkielski
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Steven Cotton
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Steve Deering
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Evstiounin, Mikhail
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Parkinson, Jonathan
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Rakers, Jason
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Jon Crowcroft
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Dawson, Peter D
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Tim Salo
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Keith Moore
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Robert Elz
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! vinton g. cerf
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Rick H Wesson
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Bob Hinden
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Anthony Atkielski
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Dawson, Peter D
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Rick H Wesson
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Anthony Atkielski
