At 04:57 AM 8/11/00 +0200, Anthony Atkielski wrote: >I have an idea: Let's merge IP addresses with telephone numbers. A person >will have one IP address for each telephone number he owns, and vice versa, >and the two numbers will be the same. great idea. When I build a telephone out of an IP dialler attached to someone's waist, a modulator on their necklace, and an earphone attached to their earring, all connected by IP on BlueTooth, what addresses do I put on the different components of the telephone? But we're still mixing addresses and numbers. An address gives you topological location; a name translates to an address. All the games you want to play with expanding and extending the telephone number are games with the name. We still need an address.
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses... Anthony Atkielski
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--wh... Salavat R. Magazov
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why no... Geoff Huston
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--wh... Bill Manning
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--wh... Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
- RE: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Corzine, Gordie
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why no... John Kristoff
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why no... Anthony Atkielski
- RE: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Rakers, Jason
- RE: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why no... Steven Cotton
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Sean Doran
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why no... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why no... Masataka Ohta
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Sean Doran
- NAT, v6, etc. Perry E. Metzger
- Re: NAT, v6, etc. Masataka Ohta
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Sean Doran
