% On the other hand even doing % nothing will be a problem - we appear to have resumed exponential % growth of the routing system again, presumably as multi-homing at % the edges starts to be more and more common. % % Geoff Huston As predicted back in the cidr development days. people multihome for a number of reasons, not the least of which is the avoidance of a single point of failure. Turning the routing system into the functional equivalent of monoply pyramid will bring down the rath of the regulators, even if there is "nothing" we can do. -- --bill
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Keith Moore
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why no... Anthony Atkielski
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--wh... Vijay Gill
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--wh... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses... Anthony Atkielski
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--wh... Salavat R. Magazov
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why no... Geoff Huston
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--wh... Bill Manning
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--wh... Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
- RE: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Corzine, Gordie
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why no... John Kristoff
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why no... Anthony Atkielski
- RE: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Rakers, Jason
- RE: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why no... Steven Cotton
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not? Sean Doran
