> What a committee with the fellow behind PSI (an > ISP, no less!) on it is proposing is clever: use > the same general principle with a range > of IPv6 addresses. It isn't really that clever. For one thing, the standards for any given category of addresses will vary from one community to another, and so it will be impossible to reach a consensus on which entities should be included in or excluded from that category. Another problem is that the very categories themselves will vary from one community to another. Smallville USA might well endorse a "kids-only" address space, but what about an Arab country that wants a "Jew-free" address space, or another country that wants a "men-only" address space? The number of required addresses spaces might be infinite, and there would be no universal consensus on the vast majority of them.
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Keith Moore
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion J. Noel Chiappa
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Eric Brunner
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Sean Doran
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Brian E Carpenter
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Mike Truskowski
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Andy Fletcher
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Brian E Carpenter
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Sean Doran
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Anthony Atkielski
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Sean Doran
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Thomas Narten
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Sean Doran
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Sean Doran
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion James Corning
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Vernon Schryver
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Greg Skinner
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion Sean Doran
- Conformance Testing of MGCP, SIP etc Yixin Zhu