> So, my opinion is that the bottleneck for deploying IPv6, and therefore > getting rid of NAPTs is the cost of IPv6 address space. it's one of the potential bottlenecks. certainly not the only one, probably not the largest. folks still have to learn about the differences between IPv4 and IPv6, and applications using IPv6 have to be deployed. those are significant bottlenecks. note that 6to4 makes the cost of getting a good-sized chunk of IPv6 address space roughly equivalent to the cost of getting a single stable IPv4 address. Keith
- PAT Peter Burggasser
- Re: PAT Jasen G. Strutt
- Re: PAT Randall . Gale
- Re: PAT Keith Moore
- RE: PAT Leonard W. Miller
- RE: PAT Lillian Komlossy
- RE: PAT Brian . Rubarts
- Re: PAT Keith Moore
- Re: PAT Michael Richardson
- Re: PAT Keith Moore
- Re: PAT Michael Richardson
- Re: PAT David R. Conrad
- getting IPv6 space withou... Michael Richardson
- Re: getting IPv6 space wi... David R. Conrad
- Re: getting IPv6 space wi... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: getting IPv6 space wi... Sean Doran
- Re: getting IPv6 space wi... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: getting IPv6 space wi... Michael Richardson
- PAT Peter Burggasser
