"David R. Conrad" wrote:
...
> > b) in the situation where I am using IPv6 instead of RFC1597, then
> > my address can't be topologically significant.
>
> If you're using this in the context of private networks, then any set of
> numbers would do. Why not pick one at random?
>
er, no. In this case you should use IPv6 site-local addresses.
Please, please, nobody ever pick a prefix at random. Your prefix should *always*
come from your upstream provider, up to the level of Top Level Aggregator,
which comes from a registry.
Brian
