At 15:04 30/08/00, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote: >I post to ietf-discuss because two of the referenced >Informational RFCs, RFC 1321 (MD5) and RFC 2104 (HMAC), >are also normative references for numerous other >Standard Track protocols. Neither of those are protocols. Instead, they specify mathematical algorithms. As such, I do not believe they need to be standards-track to be referenced NOR are they in the set of things IETF would normally standardise. >If not, would it be appropriate to submit a request >to the IESG to consider reissuing the specifications >detailed by RFC 1321 and RFC 2104 on the Standard Track? IMHO, that is not needed and not particularly desirable. Ran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Standard Track dependencies on Informational RFCs Kurt D. Zeilenga
- Re: Standard Track dependencies on Informational RF... RJ Atkinson
- Re: Standard Track dependencies on Informationa... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Standard Track dependencies on Informational RF... Scott Bradner
- Re: Standard Track dependencies on Informationa... Kurt D. Zeilenga
- Re: Standard Track dependencies on Informationa... Keith Moore
- RE: Standard Track dependencies on Informational RF... Christian Huitema
- RE: Standard Track dependencies on Informational RF... Scott Bradner
- RE: Standard Track dependencies on Informationa... Harald Alvestrand
- RE: Standard Track dependencies on Informationa... Graham Klyne
- Re: Standard Track dependencies on Informationa... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Standard Track dependencies on Informat... RJ Atkinson
