RE: Standard Track dependencies on Informational RFCs

[Graham Klyne]

At 08:36 PM 8/30/00 -0400, Scott Bradner wrote:
> > An informational RFC certainly meets these requirements.
>
>I don't think we want to say that any info RFC qualifies
>
>so how do we say just what we want to say and no more?

Promote the info RFC to BCP?

#g