The RFC series has long been THE archival series for the Internet. To avoid Internet Drafts becoming another archival series, thus creating great confusion, the IETF has chosen to make Internet Draft ephemeral, timing out after 6 months. Indeed, that is why they are called DRAFTS. The intent is that when good & useful information and ideas are published in Internet Drafts, they should become Informational RFCs if they merit preservation and referencing. A Working Group sometimes accumulates a froth of subsidiary drafts with information that is worth preserving, but ancilliary to the primary standards-track work of the group. The chairs should take steps to turn these into Informational RFCs. This was the case for the RSVP working group, for example; I know of at least once such "left-over" I-D that should have been published as Informational. It did not happen because the working group chairs were tired; however, it was their failure in this case. I expect that similar cases exist in other working groups. Bob Braden
- An Internet Draft as reference material Lee, Jiwoong
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Martin J. Duerst
- RE: An Internet Draft as reference material Tim Moors
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Grenville Armitage
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Harald Alvestrand
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Masataka Ohta
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Magnus Danielson
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Jon Crowcroft
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Bob Braden
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Charles E. Perkins
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Bob Braden
- IETF vs Books Re: An Internet Draft as referen... Grenville Armitage
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Magnus Danielson
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Simon St.Laurent
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Bob Braden
- RE: An Internet Draft as reference material Rosen, Brian
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material John Day
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Bob Braden
