> Although, actually, what would *really* benefit the > historians would be > searchable archives of the working group mailing lists, but that's a > different issue.... ;) Why is that? Seems to me it's part of the same issue, and technologically, whatever solution you find for one ought to be pretty close to the other, and if you do one, you should do the other. I do think that just because a I-D expires, does not mean it is unworthy of being preserved. Now the thread started with references to I-Ds. I do think such references, except when used as historical references, should be discouraged. Certainly, I would not like to see an RFC, especially a standard's track RFC, reference an I-D. Brian
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Magnus Danielson
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Jon Crowcroft
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Bob Braden
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Charles E. Perkins
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Bob Braden
- IETF vs Books Re: An Internet Draft as reference m... Grenville Armitage
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Magnus Danielson
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Simon St.Laurent
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Bob Braden
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Rosen, Brian
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material John Day
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Bob Braden
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Simon St.Laurent
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Robert Elz
- RE: An Internet Draft as reference material Kay, Rodney
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Simon St.Laurent
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material RL 'Bob' Morgan
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Robert Elz
- Re: An Internet Draft as reference material Scott Bradner
