I see we're about to embark on the 7th iteration of the NAT mail wars. I don't believe anything new is going to come out of it. Last night's arguments at the microphones were quoted from previous mail. Could you take it somewhere else? Is there an alt.nat group?
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Michael Richardson
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Perry E. Metzger
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! J. Noel Chiappa
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Jon Crowcroft
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Michael W. Condry
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Dennis Glatting
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Jon Crowcroft
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Fred Baker
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Scott Brim
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Keith Moore
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Tony Dal Santo
- RE: NATs *ARE* evil! Iliff, Tina
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! itojun
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Dennis Glatting
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! James Aldridge
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Geoff Huston
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Frank Solensky
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Brian E Carpenter
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Frank Solensky
