Tony Dal Santo wrote:
>
> What exactly is the state of the IPv4 "address pool"?
Hilarie Orman, Scott Marcus and I will be working together over the next
few weeks to get a more up-to-date view of the world. As soon as we get
something together, we'll announce it to the list.
-- Frank
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Jon Crowcroft
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Fred Baker
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Scott Brim
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Keith Moore
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Tony Dal Santo
- RE: NATs *ARE* evil! Iliff, Tina
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! itojun
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Dennis Glatting
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! James Aldridge
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Geoff Huston
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Frank Solensky
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Brian E Carpenter
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Frank Solensky
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Brian E Carpenter
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! David W. Morris
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Keith Moore
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Masataka Ohta
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Kurt Erik Lindqvist
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! M Dev
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Keith Moore
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Matt Holdrege
