Re: NATs *ARE* evil!

[Brian E Carpenter]

Frank Solensky wrote:
> 
> Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> >
> > Frank,
> >
> > This is goodness. Can I ask that you publish the *method* before
> > you publish any results? I have seen various attempts to
> > tackle this in the past, and they have all given results that
> > are very hard to interpret and whose meaning depends very much
> > on the method used. I think we could react to the numbers more
> > rationally if we discussed the method first.
> 
> Sure thing.
> 
> Would it make sense to spin this off as a separate list?

big-internet is probably still there.

  Brian