On 1/3/01 at 4:26 PM -0800, Dave Crocker wrote: >To write a complete specification can be an enormous effort. [...] >Perhaps things like introduction and architecture, along with a >proposed rest of the table of contents, and maybe some samples? Maybe I missed something, but since when did I-D's need to be complete specifications? An introduction and architecture alone would make a fine I-D and a fine starting place for WG discussion. pr -- Pete Resnick <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Eudora Engineering - QUALCOMM Incorporated
- Re: When presentations are a good idea (Re: IETF logist... Fred Baker
- Re: When presentations are a good idea (Re: IETF l... Keith Moore
- Re: When presentations are a good idea (Re: IETF l... Michael Richardson
- Re: When presentations are a good idea (Re: IETF logist... Dave Crocker
- Re: When presentations are a good idea (Re: IETF logist... Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: When presentations are a good idea (Re: IETF logist... Pete Resnick
- Re: When presentations are a good idea (Re: IETF logist... Scott Brim
- Re: When presentations are a good idea (Re: IETF logist... Dave Crocker
- Re: When presentations are a good idea (Re: IETF logist... Pete Resnick
