On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 04:26:43PM -0800, Dave Crocker wrote: > We need some sort of intermediate (or partial) "specification" which > provides enough detail for making choice among approaches, but does not > require a complete effort. > > Perhaps things like introduction and architecture, along with a proposed > rest of the table of contents, and maybe some samples? These things used to be called RFCs, then I-Ds. Can't they still be I-Ds? ...Scott
- When presentations are a good idea (Re: IETF logistics) Harald Alvestrand
- Re: When presentations are a good idea (Re: IETF l... Fred Baker
- Re: When presentations are a good idea (Re: IE... Keith Moore
- Re: When presentations are a good idea (Re: IE... Michael Richardson
- Re: When presentations are a good idea (Re: IETF l... Dave Crocker
- Re: When presentations are a good idea (Re: IETF l... Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: When presentations are a good idea (Re: IE... Dave Crocker
- Re: When presentations are a good idea (Re: IETF l... Pete Resnick
- Re: When presentations are a good idea (Re: IETF l... Scott Brim
- Re: When presentations are a good idea (Re: IETF l... Dave Crocker
- Re: When presentations are a good idea (Re: IETF l... Pete Resnick
- Re: When presentations are a good idea (Re: IE... Dave Crocker
