You know, the people on this list make great computer scientists, network architects, application and protocol designers. I'm not so sure how many of us understand CHI. Some of us like to think we do, but I suspect very few of us actually do. So, given this, why don't we ask some people who really DO understand this problem to come up with a decent recommendation, rather than perennially flaming about it? Then we can ask them to help us with NATs ;-)
- RE: Why XML is perferable Shaw, Robert
- Re: Why XML is perferable Bob Braden
- Re: Why XML is perferable Jun'an Gao
- Re: Why XML is perferable Sean Finn
- Re: Why XML is perferable Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Why XML is perferable Bob Braden
- Re: Why XML is perferable Stephen McHenry
- Re: Why XML is perferable Jon Crowcroft
- Re: Why XML is perferable John Stracke
- Re: Why XML is perferable Ren
- Re: Why XML is perferable Eliot Lear
- Re: Why XML is perferable Scott Brim
- Re: Why XML is perferable Stephen McHenry
- Re: Why XML is perferable Bill Manning
