Just out of curiosity: Why aren't we using something like a RealAudio stream? This seems to work well for everything from radio stations to ICANN meetings. I know it only works ONE way, but I also know that "questions from the multicast audience" are rarely heard anyway. The thing about Real (and I guess the Windows Media Player) is that it is widely available and used, while the multicast tools seem tied to high-end workstations. Maybe that's just my impression? Ole Ole J. Jacobsen Editor and Publisher The Internet Protocol Journal Office of the CTO, Cisco Systems Tel: +1 408-527-8972 GSM: +1 415-370-4628 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj
- bandwidth (and other support) required for multicas... Keith Moore
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for... David Meyer
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for... Keith Moore
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required... Joel Jaeggli
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for... Daniel Senie
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required... John Hawkinson
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for... Ole J. Jacobsen
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required... Henning G. Schulzrinne
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for... Keith Moore
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for... Ole J. Jacobsen
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required... Matt Crawford
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for... Keith Moore
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for... Ole J. Jacobsen
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for... Keith Moore
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for... Ole J. Jacobsen
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for... Keith Moore
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for... Lyndon Nerenberg
