Interesting logic. So, meanwhile, you would rather we NOT use widely available tools that allow "remote viewing" just because: - They aren't standards based - They aren't available on absolutely every platform Isn't this counter to allowing more participation? What's the alternative, wait for Keith to bring about a better reality? I give up. Ole On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Keith Moore wrote: > > Sometimes I think your techno religion outweights any sense of reality, > > I'm interested in bringing about a better reality, > not preserving the current one. > > Keith >
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for mult... Daniel Senie
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for... John Hawkinson
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for mult... Ole J. Jacobsen
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for... Henning G. Schulzrinne
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for mult... Keith Moore
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for mult... Ole J. Jacobsen
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for... Matt Crawford
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for mult... Keith Moore
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for mult... Ole J. Jacobsen
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for mult... Keith Moore
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for mult... Ole J. Jacobsen
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for mult... Keith Moore
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for mult... Lyndon Nerenberg
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for... Simon Leinen
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for... Alastair Matthews
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for mult... itojun
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for mult... Vernon Schryver
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for... Francis Dupont
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for mult... Ole J. Jacobsen
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for... Michael H. Lambert
