At 12:12 30/03/01, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
>With h.261/pcm and mpeg-1 you should be able to implement a client for
>your platform of choice without stomping on someone elses IP to hard, in
>practice clients are already available for most platforms, or can be built
>there with a modicum of effort.
>
>> Open standards is a fine thing, but you have to have some implementations
>> and common use before it really matters.
>
>Can't argue there. but we do have the implementations.
Precisely what is the URL for the Solaris/SPARC
implementation, so I can download it and play with it ?
Or did you mean to say that "we have PC implementations" ?
Thanks,
Ran
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for mult... Vernon Schryver
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for... Francis Dupont
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for mult... Ole J. Jacobsen
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for... Michael H. Lambert
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for... Einar Stefferud
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for mult... Vernon Schryver
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for mult... Joel Jaeggli
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for mult... Joel Jaeggli
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for mult... RJ Atkinson
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for... Joel Jaeggli
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for... Henning G. Schulzrinne
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for mult... Alastair Matthews
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for... Gary E. Miller
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for... Keith Moore
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required... Kent Crispin
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for mult... Keith Moore
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for mult... Michael Richardson
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for mult... Valdis . Kletnieks
