In your previous mail you wrote: It's time to accept the fact that something is very wrong. I don't know if the fatal flaws are in the basic idea, the routing, the greedy shortsightedness of ISP's, or some evil conspiracy. Regardless of why, if it is be dead dead, it's not alive. It's time to fix it or bury it. => according to some discussions with ISP technical people, IMHO the problem is the cost in managing the routing stuff: this cost (a large number of skilled engineers) is higher than the turnover! But there is a good news: SSM already seems to have got market acceptance so multicast is not yet dead... Regards [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for mult... Ole J. Jacobsen
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for mult... Keith Moore
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for mult... Ole J. Jacobsen
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for mult... Keith Moore
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for mult... Lyndon Nerenberg
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for... Simon Leinen
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for... Alastair Matthews
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for mult... itojun
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for mult... Vernon Schryver
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for... Francis Dupont
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for mult... Ole J. Jacobsen
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for... Michael H. Lambert
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for... Einar Stefferud
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for mult... Vernon Schryver
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for mult... Joel Jaeggli
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for mult... Joel Jaeggli
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for mult... RJ Atkinson
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for... Joel Jaeggli
- Re: bandwidth (and other support) required for... Henning G. Schulzrinne
