> > > There's some discussion of Panama requirements in 'The New New Thing'. > > > Not just a lock, but there's a bridge to worry about; passing under it > > > at low tide is your height limit. > > > > i would imagine the problem would be at high, not low, tide. > oops. mea culpa. > > L. Sorry to add yet another post to a pointless thread but... Lloyd was right the first time. Height limit would be based on low tide. For ships that are near the height limit, waiting a mean time of 6 hours for the next low tide is not a big deal. -Mark
- RE: Carrier Class Gateway Doyle, Francis X.
- RE: Carrier Class Gateway Robert G. Ferrell
- Re: Carrier Class Gateway Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Carrier Class Gateway Robert G. Ferrell
- Re: Carrier Class Gateway Robert G. Ferrell
- Re: Carrier Class Gateway Pat Holden
- RE: Carrier Class Gateway Christian Huitema
- RE: Carrier Class Gateway Dawson, Peter D
- Re: Carrier Class Gateway Matt Crawford
- Re: Carrier Class Gateway James P. Salsman
- Re: Carrier Class Gateway Mark . Abinante
- Re: Carrier Class Gateway Robert G. Ferrell
- Re: Carrier Class Gateway Pat Holden
- Re: Carrier Class Gateway Bill Manning
- Re: Carrier Class Gateway Jose Manuel Arronte Garcia
- RE: Carrier Class Gateway Joe Aiello
- Re: Carrier Class Gateway Robert G. Ferrell
- Re: Carrier Class Gateway Jose Manuel Arronte Garcia
- Re: Carrier Class Gateway Pat Holden
- Re: Carrier Class Gateway Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: Carrier Class Gateway Jon Crowcroft
