Not on the bridge, the need to cross UNDER it...
M.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Manning" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Dawson, Peter D" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 2:25 P
Subject: Re: Carrier Class Gateway
>
> semantically confused. why would sailors be on the
> bridge? (the one over the canal)
>
> Or is this a case of ShipsIntheNight
>
>
> %
> % .....dark fiber optics..based on Dense Wavelength
> % Division Multiplexing.. layed 2 km below the surface
> % of the sea... oh factor in high/low tide ...
> %
> % ->-----Original Message-----
> % ->From: Pat Holden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> % ->Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 2:05 PM
> % ->To: Robert G. Ferrell; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> % ->Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> % ->Subject: Re: Carrier Class Gateway
> % ->
> % ->
> % ->what type of media do you propose to run ISBP over?
> % ->----- Original Message -----
> % ->From: "Robert G. Ferrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> % ->To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> % ->Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> % ->Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 1:13 PM
> % ->Subject: Re: Carrier Class Gateway
> % ->
> % ->
> % ->> >And of *course*, you want the bridge and the ship to be
> % ->using some sort
> % ->> >of IM Presence protocol so each knows the other is there....
> % ->>
> % ->> This is a perfect application for the ISBP (Intraship
> % ->Bridge Protocol)...
> % ->>
> % ->> RGF
> % ->
> %
>
>
> --
> --bill
