Keith Moore wrote: > > it occurs to me that most of the methods that have been proposed > for filtering spam from mailing lists have a lot in common with NATs. actually, have more in common with firewalls. firewalls serve a filtering purpose, and (gasp!) people have learned to configure proxies into their www, etc, clients. we've gotten over it. and so can it be with mailing lists. cheers, gja
- filtering of mailing lists and NATs Keith Moore
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs grenville armitage
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs grenville armitage
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Keith Moore
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs grenville armitage
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs grenville armitage
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Eric Rosen
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Leo Vegoda
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Robert Elz
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Francis Dupont
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs ned . freed
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs grenville armitage
