Keith Moore wrote: > however, I have seen a couple of occasions where I believe that > a 'moderator' acted inappropriately in filtering messages that > came from non-subscribers but were arguably on-topic for the lists. So the non-subscriber subscribed, and their posts went through okay, right? (If not, and the moderator was in fact filtering all posts to the mailing list in question, then this example is a red-herring.) Gas tanks explode - we ban cars? Cigarette butts cause fires - we ban cigarettes? Moderators go loopy sometimes - we ban subscribe-before-post mailing lists? You got me there, guv! I concede. cheers, gja
- filtering of mailing lists and NATs Keith Moore
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs grenville armitage
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs grenville armitage
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Keith Moore
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs grenville armitage
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs grenville armitage
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Eric Rosen
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Leo Vegoda
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Robert Elz
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Francis Dupont
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs ned . freed
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs grenville armitage
- Social solutions mean lawyers... Re: filte... grenville armitage
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Keith Moore
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Keith Moore
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Donald E. Eastlake 3rd