Christian> I would much rather receive and delete another annoying Christian> proposition to get rich quick or see lurid pictures than tolerate Christian> any form of censorship. As has been pointed out, the non-member messages can be moderated. It takes about one second to look at a message and tell whether it is unsolicited commercial or not. So the downside is that the non-member message may be delayed for a bit until the moderator gets to it. I wouldn't call that censorship. (I think one has to be very privileged indeed to confuse a small inconvenience with censorship.) Unless, of course, you think that people have a RIGHT to send unsolicited commercial email to IETF mailing lists.
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Eric Rosen
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Leo Vegoda
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Robert Elz
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Francis Dupont
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs ned . freed
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs grenville armitage
- Social solutions mean lawyers... Re: filtering... grenville armitage
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Keith Moore
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Keith Moore
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Eric Rosen
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Keith Moore
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Pyda Srisuresh
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs James Aviani
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs John Kristoff
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Keith Moore
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Kevin Farley
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs ned . freed
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Keith Moore
- RE: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Christian Huitema
- RE: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Tony Hain