Robert Elz wrote: [..] > This is not a technological problem - it is a social problem. We cannot > fix spam by technological means - it has to be fixed by social means. If you remove technological means you're left with "Bad spammer, please don't send email to our list". The non-technical escalation path (aka 'social means') then leads to lawyers and politicians thinking they know what's best. Then you'd really see what it feels like to have the wrong weapon brought to bear on a problem. I shudder at the thought. cheers, gja
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs grenville armitage
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Keith Moore
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs grenville armitage
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs grenville armitage
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Eric Rosen
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Leo Vegoda
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Robert Elz
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Francis Dupont
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs ned . freed
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs grenville armitage
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs grenville armitage
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Keith Moore
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Keith Moore
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Eric Rosen
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Keith Moore
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Pyda Srisuresh
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs James Aviani
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs John Kristoff
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Keith Moore
- Re: filtering of mailing lists and NATs Kevin Farley