Keith Moore wrote: > > > Well, that is an experimental question. My feeling is that if a specific > > process question comes up - let's say, a proposal to increase IAB > > membership to 99 seats, to create a silly example - we could have a > > much more focussed discussion in the "iab99" WG with a very limited > > charter than has proved possible in recent years in Poisson. > > Problem is, process questions are not always that specific. If for > example there were a growing sense that WGs take too long, that IESG > approves too many broken documents, and that too many WGs are having > an adverse effect on the Internet architecture - the solution to > this problem might somehow involve IETF process, but we would not be > likely to find a solution by chartering a WG that is centered around > someone's draft proposal.
True, but if someone writes a problem statement we could charter a SLOWBROKEN WG to find a solution. Brian
