> there's more than one kind of effectiveness. effectiveness at getting > a technology deployed is quite different from effectiveness of that > technology (once deployed) at supporting reliable operation for a > variety of applications.
keith - may i refer you to don eastlake's earlier reply? viz., the existing system is quite effective because products that don't play by the concensus rules have a much harder time thriving or even surviving. > Just to pick a small example: MIME has been out for nearly 10 years and > I'm still receiving, on a daily basis, MIME attachments that are > unreadable because they lack proper content-type labelling. > That's not what I would call "effective". then ignore it or fix it. obviously, the pain isn't at the point where it bothers you... for myself, the program that handles my incoming mail dumps MIME-bad stuff into an audit file and then ignores it. if it was "important", then whoever sent it can get on the phone... in doing this for the last 10 years, i've yet to suffer a mishap because of this... /mtr
