On Sat, 05 Oct 2002 07:38:51 +0859, Masataka Ohta said: > I'm routing based on circuit ID. Current RSVP does not.
Like I said - RSVP is *NOT* circuit based. > You misunderstand the problem. Not in the slightest. I understand RSVP - what I objected to was the statement that RSVP is circuit based. > The problem is that a protocol to tweak the control of an underlying > bandwidth allocation is pretty useless if there isn't enough bandwidth > to tweak. I'm aware of that. > You can't reserve 1Gbps on the best effort path with T1 circuit, even > if the T1 circuit is not broken. Old news. The following has been .sig fodder since at least 13 Feb 1990: ***> NETWORK PLANNING CONSTRAINT OF THE MONTH: ***> "You can't send bits over a non-existent link." ***> --Valdis Kletnieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
msg09082/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
