[cc's trimmed]
Regardless of the specifics of this case, I think a good rule would be to
say that all bounced messages on any IETF list MUST be archived on a
separate 'bounced' list. To whom would this suggestion best be directed?
On 27 Nov 2002, D. J. Bernstein wrote:
> Once again: Bush is (1) subjecting a huge number of legitimate messages
> to manual review and (2) silently discarding many of these legitimate
> messages, apparently at a rate of hundreds per year (not counting mine).
>
> Both #1 and #2 are unacceptable. I want the manual reviews _eliminated_.
> If a message isn't posted immediately, it must be bounced, with a clear
> explanation of how to have it posted without Bush's intervention.
>
> If the IETF documentation doesn't make sufficiently clear that Bush's
> behavior is unacceptable, that documentation also has to be fixed.
>
> ---D. J. Bernstein, Associate Professor, Department of Mathematics,
> Statistics, and Computer Science, University of Illinois at Chicago
>
>
--
Please visit http://www.icannwatch.org
A. Michael Froomkin | Professor of Law | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
+1 (305) 284-4285 | +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax) | http://www.law.tm
-->It's hot here.<--
