> I really wish that the IETF > had designed a decent NAT box spec that's an oxymoron. the basic premis of NAT is fundamnetally broken.
- RE: myth of the great transition (was US Defense D... Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defe... Valdis . Kletnieks
- NAT box spec? (RE: myth of the great transiti... Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: NAT box spec? (RE: myth of the great ... james woodyatt
- Re: NAT box spec? (RE: myth of the gr... Keith Moore
- Re: NAT box spec? (RE: myth of th... james woodyatt
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defe... Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defe... Keith Moore
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US Defe... Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: myth of the great transition (was US ... Keith Moore
- Re: myth of the great transition (was... Eric Rescorla
- Re: myth of the great transition ... Keith Moore
- Re: myth of the great transi... Eric Rescorla
- Re: myth of the great tr... Keith Moore
- Re: myth of the grea... Eric Rescorla
- Re: myth of the grea... Keith Moore
- Re: myth of the grea... Eric Rescorla
- Re: myth of the grea... Keith Moore
