On 6/18/2003 1:18 PM, Melinda Shore wrote: >>We're doing it. > > .......the real problem is that many people bringing new > work to the IETF don't know how to accept being told "no" > and it leads to harass-a-thons of the IESG on the one hand > and dubious work on the other.
:-) :-) I agree. >>Primarily, folks want to use it as in >>"Ethernet-over-MPLS". That may not necessarily go down >>well with you either, but think of MPLS as a logical FR. > > I think we need to retain a focus on connectionless, > packet-oriented delivery and how to build on that. I wonder > if we aren't going considerably astray with the growing > emphasis on pseudo-circuits. Again, I agree and support.
