> > so it's not like I haven't actually been working on solving the > > problem. > > I didn't say you haven't been. So, my question at this point is: > > (1) If these solutions aren't available, why not? > (2) If they are available and people don't want them, why not?
it may be too early, and lots of people are still misinformed. > Rather than complaining about NAT, it seems like we would be better > served assuming that people have reasons for making the choices > they have and trying to accomodate those. the two are not mutually exclusive. and though I do assume that people have reasons for making they choices they make, why should I assume either that the people have much of a choice, or that the reasons that the people give are valid, in the presence of ample evidence to the contrary?
