Noel Chiappa writes: > Now, can we all agree that almost 10 years after it was formally adopted by > the IETF, IPv6 is has clearly not succeeded in becoming the ubiquitous > replacement for IPv4, and needs to be moved to "Historic", so we can turn our > energy and attention to things that *will* succeed?
What leads you to believe that an alternate
solution set isn't the empty set? Isn't entropy
the easiest and most likely outcome?
Mike
